We love technology, how things work, and digging in behind the scenes and so an important part of our trip around the world in a small boat has included stops to tour ice breakers, mines, manufacturing plants, container ships. We even tried our hands at the helm of a 5,000 HP tractor tug. Some highlights from this interest:
- Richards Bay Minerals
- Bell Equipment Factory Tour
- Australian Grand Prix
- On Board the Aurora Australis
- On Board the Hanjin Oslo
- On Board the Marion Dufresne
- 2015 Moth Worlds
- Team Oracle USA Foiling Camp
- Drone Arial Photography
- On Board the SL Herbert
- West Coast Wilderness Railway
- Superior Pak Factory Tour
Last summer I got a chance to tour the Holland America Westerdam. The Westerdam works the Seattle to Alaska route during the summer months and when I visited, the boat was docked at Pier 99 in Seattle. Each Sunday during the summer the ship arrives in and docks at 6am, the entire load of 1,848 passengers and tons of baggage are disembarked, a similar load is brought back on board, the ship is provisioned to keep the 1,848 passengers and 800 crew well fed and happy for a week, and somehow the ship leaves the dock at 4pm that afternoon. All this is done in only 10 hours on the dock. Just watching the logistics team at the dock is exciting.
The Westerdam is an impressive feat of engineering. It is powered by three V16 diesel engines each producing 15,400 hp and two V12 diesels producing 11,575hp each. It also has a GE LM2500 gas turbine producing a booming 18,760 hp by itself. The ship is a diesel electric design much like large train locomotives where the engines drive generators and the propulsion is via electric motors. This is very common in cruise ships and it allows them to adjust the number of engines running to match the combined hotel load (the electric power required by the ship itself) and propulsion for increased efficiency. At high speeds, more engines are needed and at dock fewer are needed. It also allows engines to be taken out of service without impacting speed or the power available for on-board consumption. At some docks including the Seattle Pier 99 facility, power is supplied directly to the Westerdam via large cables so the engines don’t need to run at all, improving the air quality in the area.
The gas turbine on the Westerdam is a bit less common. It was installed when the Westerdam was built to ensure the ship would be in compliance with expected regulations disallowing any visible exhaust smoke. It didn’t end up being needed and, since the other 5 diesel engines are much more fuel efficient, they are used exclusively. The gas turbine is maintained and available if needed but, in normal operation, it is not used.
General Electric LM2500 gas turbine generator. | Injection lines and control system from the GE LM2500 gas turbine. |
To propel and maneuver the ship, there are two Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) azipods at the stern capable of producing up to 24,000 hp each when operating forward. At full output, these engines will turn the props at 142 RPM and attain a ships speed of 24 kts (27.6 MPH). When maneuvering, the two props can be rotated through 360 degrees and, in this mode, output is limited to a still very high 13,500 hp each. At the bow of the ship, there are three bow thrusters to move the boat sideways while docking. These are also electric motors driving props and each can produce 2,500 hp.
The Westerdam is one of 11 Vista Class Cruise Ship and it was built by the Italian shipyard Fincantieri Marghera for Holland America Cruise Lines and it was delivered in 2004. The ship is a Panamax design so (just barely) capable of navigating the Panama Canal at 936′ long and 105.8′ wide. It draws up to 26′ and comes in at 81,811 gross tons.
Beside the ship, it’s absolutely massive but those that have been at the helm of even small boats, it really feels huge when seen from the bridge. The captain has to be incredibly precise to ease this nearly quarter-mile-long vessel up to the dock. And, to make things truly challenging, the passenger loading dock at Seattle’s Pier 99 doesn’t move so the boat has to nail the disembarkation mark precisely from 100s of feet away.
Looking across the breadth of the Westerdam bridge. It’s a very big boat. | Bridge Wing Thruster and Azipod controls |
Bridge RADAR and ECDIS (Electronic Chart Display and Information System) |
The view from the bridge wing is incredible. From here you are actually out over the dock in a part of the bridge that extends out beyond the side of the ship. It’s almost scary in that you standing on a glass floor surrounded by just about only glass with all the controls for the azipods and thrusters at hand. It is from here that the captain brings in the ship very carefully metering out thousands of potential hp to gently draw to a stop up against the dock. The combination of azipods and bow thrusters allow the ship to be docked without tug assistance. But one false move, and a few million dollars of damage will result. If you get a chance to watch a cruise ship docking, put binoculars on the bridge wing to see a master at work.
As an example of running the ship from the bridge wing, here’s is a shot of the bridge of a cruise ship passing closely beside us at Margerie Glacier in Glacier Bay National Park in Alaska. The captain had radioed us to assure us he was going to be careful and he inched past at less than 2 knots but so close we could talk to passengers on the lower decks without yelling.
Looking up to the bridge of the Sea Princess as the ship inches by us at Margerie Glacier in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. |
Thanks to the entire crew of the Westerdam, but especially the Captain for the detailed bridge tour and the Chief Officer who was incredibly generous with his time and really showed me the details of how the Westerdam worked. It’s an amazing ship.
More reading:
- ms Westerdam: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Westerdam
- Beyond Ships Westerdam Profile: http://www.beyondships.com/HAL-Westerdam.html
- Useless Westerdam Info: http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=864196
- Holland America Westerdam: http://www.hollandamerica.com/cruise-vacation-onboard/Westerdam
BTW – looks like “Tim’s” are the most interested in this post! :>)
Great write-up James. Brought back a flood of memories from early in my career when I was GE’s lead systems engineer for the US Navy’s DDG-51 Destroyer Machinery Control System. We had responsibility for all propulsion, electrical plant and damage control systems. Four LM2500’s – can’t say her top speed but she could get up and go. I appreciate you taking the time to write-up these articles.
BTW – how is your Raspberry Pi project working out? I’m heading down and arduino path right now with cellular connectivity for my basic monitoring system. Have found Wifi to still be quite unreliable in marinas and I don’t have the advanced communication systems you have on Dirona. I will probably throw the Pi back in with Wifi for those instances when connectivity is good. Just need to experiment some more.
Safe travels!
Thanks James for the tour. Interesting that they have the LM2500 installed but don’t use it much. That gas turbine is installed in many US Navy war ships. But I guess the Navy is not as fuel conscious as the cruise ships industry.
I wonder why that once the ship is dock and aligned with passenger walkway, they don’t paint a mark on the pier directly under the bridge wing?
Yes, the gas turbines are used on Navy ships and I’ve seem them on ice breakers as well. But most of the designs I’ve seen have both diesel and turbine power and only use the turbines when full power is demanded when ice breaking or running at flank speed. Turbines are beutiful engines with impressive power to size ratios, nearly unbeatable power to weight ratios, and low maintenance requirements. But, it’s hard to beat the cost effectiveness of heavy oil burning diesels.
James, yet another possibly-dumb question: Do you know if that LM2500 also doubles up as an analogue to Dirona’s wing engine – something mechanically as diverse as possible to ensure that das Boot still have _some_ power?
Not something you would necessarily want to rely on for a long period of time, but enough to leave you very confident of getting home.
Yes, absolutely. All the cruise ship engines effectively backup the rest. It’s a deisel electric so has 6 generators that run the hotel loads as well as the two main props and the 3 bow thrusters. They run the number of generators needed for the expected load. Any of the generators can be brought down with the rest of the generators supporting the load. Taking a couple of generators off line won’t have much impact on the overall capabilities of the boat.
The more common large cruise ship design is to have 6 diesel generators. This ship is a bit less common wiht 5 diesels and the turbine with the turbine able to carry the entire load allowing all the rest of the engines to be off line. Diesel electric gives up a bit in efficiency over mechanical drive but it’s super versatile and space efficient.
Spruance class (DD-963) destroyers used 4 LM2500’s for propulsion. 2 per shaft. Of course through very large reduction gears.
4 LM2500s? Now that is a smokin’ fast boat. It’s amazing what tax dollars in large concentrations can achieve :-)
The LM2500 was a work-horse for the US Navy during the 80s and 90s. More than 800 were installed in US ships (FFG-7s had two, CG-47, DD-963, and DDG-51s all had four LM2500s).
Newer US warships are going with a different gas turbine and diesel combination.
I remember we swapped out an LM2500 engine in less than 24 hours. The engine modules were located on tracks allowing the engine to be ‘rolled’ up the exhaust stack (with the assist of a crane).
The LM2500 more than 50 years after it’s first release is still getting heavy use. It’s hard to get 25,000+ HP in a smaller and lighter package. They are reliable and can fit in a shipping container. But efficiency advantages will continue to have reciprocating engines winning for commercial shipping.
Celebrity’s Millenium class ship use a pair of 2500+ and the exhaust gas heat is partially recovered by a boiler and steam turbine boosting the total efficiency to almost 50%. That is a little better than these diesels. However the turbines require jet fuel which is a lot more expensive than the bunker oil the diesels use.
Interesting design point on the Celibrity Milleium use of a pair of gas turbines. There are lots of upsides to the design including no visible exhaust, far smaller than comparable output reciprocating engines, higher efficiency, and long life between overhauls. You covered the downside, they need to run on jet fuel rather than being able to chose to run on either diesel or bunker crude. I would think that even extremely efficient running on jet fuel would be more expensive than reciprocating engines on bunker crude. There is no question that the turbines are better for the environment. Given that fuel is a high percentage of overall ship operating costs, I’m surprised the turbines came out ahead on the Millenium class ships. Thanks for passing that along Louis.
Because that would be unique to Westerdam. Many cruise ships use this same pier, and each one would need a unique mark. The port would not allow this, and their would be cases of mix up.
Great article and thank you for taking the time to document the ship tour. I have always wanted to do the one on Royal Caribbean but they charge $150! It is amazing that they can offload, clean and prepare the ship starting at 8:00 am and leave by 5:00 pm with so much precision. It is also amazing whether you are here in Pasadena at my cafeteria, on a cruise ship in Seattle or watching the sunset in St. Lucia we all end up eating Sysco.
We used to live at Pier 66 in Seattle and during the cruise ship season, we got 3 ships a week arriving at 6am and sailing at 4pm Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Having watched them load countless times it was fun watching it from the other side. They have fast loading and stowing down to a fine art.